Bread

Writing my post about bacon last week led me to thinking about bread, as the perfection of a bacon butty depends not only the filling; the quality of the bread is vital too.

My preference is for a good quality multi seeded, sliced wholemeal, but I’ll not turn up my nose at a tasty, crusty baguette. What is key is that it not be cakey or woolly, nor sweetened.

Bread in the US is always a mystery to me.   My recent experience is that in order to get an edible loaf one has to seek out ‘artisan’ made bread and pay 6 bucks a loaf for the privilege.  What I don’t really understand is that lots of people originally from Germany or Italy have emigrated to America over the decades, but they didn’t seem to take any of their bakers with them.

Bread and grain has been a staple in the European diet for centuries; poor harvest have led to civil unrest and famine.  The word is wound into English to indicate both the foodstuff, but the person who provides it, as in bread winner.  Bread and butter is the minimum a person can expect and on which fancier things might be built.

Yet there can be a disconnect between that historical importance and current mores among those who believe they have a wheat ‘intolerance’, and forswear its consumption while encouraging others to do the same.  With the exception of those people who suffer from Coeliac Disease, this always strikes me as an indulgence available only to those living in wealthy societies.

A few weeks ago I heard a radio programme about the relief effort run by the UNHCR in Bosnia during the war.  During the siege of Sarajevo their absolute priority was to keep the city’s bakery open as it had both the obvious benefit of providing food, but also a strong impact on moral.  Freshly produced bread is the minimum that a community is entitled to expect.

When I lived in Moscow I developed quite a taste for black rye bread, largely because it would stay fresh longer than anything else I could find.  I remember taking some UK visitors to the Bolshoi who commented with incredulity that at the theatre it was possible to have caviar, but only on stale bread.

I used to have Russian lessons on a Sunday morning, and would sometimes be still half asleep when Volodya, my teacher arrived.  As I would rarely have done the homework he has set me the previous week, it became a game between us to see how quickly I could divert him from grammar exercises and instead prompt him to talk about current affairs, his university, or his specialist study of Russian etymology.  I was, at the very least, enhancing my passive vocabulary.

One of his particular areas of interest was the widespread use of bread imagery in the Russian language.  As I had neither the vocabulary nor the grammar to tell him the same was true in English, I just let him talk.  Bread and salt are the symbols of hospitality, both necessary and highly prized; bread is at the head of everything.  One week he even persuaded me to try kvass, a traditional slightly alcoholic ‘soft’ drink  made from fermented bread, as he had been bemoaning its decline in popularity against the influx of Coca Cola and similar products of multinational behemoths making their presences felt.

In the spirit of cultural exchange I got him to taste my personally imported Marmite, on toast.  I think it would be fair to say he liked it even less than I liked the kvass.

Making Something out of Nothing

It’s turning into a bit of a preoccupation at the moment….how much stuff do we really need?

A few days ago, I was sitting on a bench in St James’s Park with a friend in the unseasonably warm and  pleasant sunshine.  Hoards of tourists walked first in one direction to catch the Changing of The Guard, and then, after the swirl of the band had faded back into the barracks,  they all returned in the opposite direction.  Meanwhile we sat and chatted, while the children ran around playing tag, avoiding a group of young lads playing football under the trees.

It reminded us both of times in Moscow when we had remarked on how little it took for our Russian colleagues to make a party.  They didn’t seem to need a special place or special extra forms of entertainment; it was enough that they were together and were going to have some fun.  If there was a ball they’d have a game, if there was a lake everyone would swim, if someone had brought a guitar along there would be singing, but even if there was nothing, a game could be devised, or a song in which everyone could join in and dance to.

In my early days in Moscow, I’d wonder what we were going to do when we appeared to have nothing with us.  What were we going to eat and drink; not knowing that all you needed was potato, tomato, cucumber and a bit of dill and you could make any manner of things in all kinds of combinations.  Take a few shashlik skewers, build a fire in the woods, and you’d have yourselves a full on feast.

When do we lose that ability to make something for ourselves by the simple act of sharing it?

When I hear of children participating in endless improving after school activities, followed by hours of playing on computer games, I wonder how they would make out given a sunny day, a grassy park and a couple of friends.  Can they still imagine a game for themselves, or do they need more equipment and a supply of electricity?

Don’t get me wrong, I was quite often bored as a child, but that was usually because I’d finished my book and had to sit still somewhere.  These days, the absence of obligations and things that have to be, or should be done, presents tremendous freedom to sit and stare, to people watch and to imagine stories; or to sit with friends and to share those moments of both quiet and noisy laughter.

Drinking in the office

I was prompted by one of those ‘do you remember when’ conversations with a friend from my Moscow days to reflect on the different approaches it is possible to have to office parties, drinking, and having fun; not that I would claim to be that good at any of them.

When I first arrived to work in Moscow in the mid 1990′s the firm I worked for already had an established habit of having the fairly frequent birthday drinks or celebratory get togethers in the largest of the office’s meeting rooms.

The senior managers of the office were Brits from the ‘let’s all go to the pub on a Friday’ tradition.  I think partying in the office was a solution to the problem that there were not that many places nearby that were pleasant to drink in, or which it was possible to persuade the younger team members, especially the young women to go.

The system had quickly become well established; a couple of the junior members of the department and one of the firm’s drivers would go out to the kiosks and come back with imported beer, fruit juice, shampanski (usually sweet, warm and very difficult to open), vodka, chocolates and fruit (oranges or bananas), if they could find any.  They would arrange the spoils of the shopping excursion in a semi circle on the conference table; there would be plastic cups and paper plates for the fruit.

One of my English colleagues mentioned, not long after he arrived, that in the UK we often had wine too, as well as a few savoury things, perhaps, ‘maybe nuts?’ he suggested.  And thereafter there were always Georgian wine (not recommended) and nuts of unpredictable variety, peanuts, sometimes salted, sometimes raw, other times plain cob nuts or hazelnuts, arranged neatly on a paper plate.

The drinks would be timed to start at 6ish, but there was always a slow start.  The Brits would stay at their desks to finish their work before turning off their computers, packing up their desks and then plunging into the party.  Many of the Russians would leave their desks at the appointed hour, go for 15 minutes, drink one glass of shampanski, eat a handful of chocolates and then return to their desks.  We were lucky to overlap.

There would always be wine left at the end of the evening; I concluded that no-one liked wine.

I often found myself sipping my warm shampanski while chatting to one of my colleagues who would throw their head back, down a shot of vodka in one and follow it with a swift beer chaser.  At the time I think it was still relatively rare to find the mixers like tonic or cola with which they might otherwise have diluted the vodka.

When it came time to organise my leaving do, I recall announcing that, as a final last hoorah, I would have some decent wine to drink.  As I’d never seen anyone else even try the Georgian wine that had been left at the end of most parties, I only bought 6 bottles of averagely decent French wine, and also stocked up on the usual shampanski, beer and vodka.

Turns out it was only Georgian wine that no-one liked.

To make sure I had something to drink, I spent the evening holding my plastic cup in one hand and a bottle of the wine in the other.

‘Is that real wine?’ people asked holding out their glasses for a top up.

It’s a description of ancient history now.

The story of the dustbins of Pimms in the park by the river will have to wait for another day….

Tolstoy

The BBC has recently broadcast a two part programme to commemorate, only a year late, the centenary of the death of Leo Tolstoy.  It was an interesting examination of the life and some of the works of the writer of what some say is the best novel ever written.

I realised as I watched it, a mixture of Alan Yentob variously sitting on trains and wandering about the steppe and the grounds of Yasnaya Polyana, and selected talking heads from both the UK and Russia, that I had retained more of the information I gleaned during my teenage readings of the novels and Troyat’s biography than I would have thought possible.  I didn’t really learn anything new from the programmes (a surprise when sometimes I have difficulty remembering what I did last week), but it was interesting to think about it again.

I read ‘War and Peace’ first, and although I skipped over the sections on history because I found the details of war disturbing and those on philosophy because I didn’t really understand them, I loved the stories of Natasha and Pierre, and I rattled through the book sitting on the floor in my bedroom with my back against the radiator.

‘Anna Karenina’, a gift from my parents on my 15th birthday, made an even deeper impression on me; not just the story of Anna and Vronsky, it explored the relationships around them; clearly foreshadowed in the famous opening line ‘All happy families are alike but an unhappy family is unhappy after its own fashion.’

I was very struck by the limits on Anna’s freedom to choose, and the terrible consequences for her when she chose to break with convention.  Vronsky could still go out in society, but she was confined to her house where no respectable woman would speak to her.  When I first read the novel I didn’t question that she would leave her son in order to follow her romantic heart, now I do wonder about that more, that in fact it was that which might ultimately seal her tragic fate.

Where I was intrigued by the choices Anna made, and her mental torment, one of my school friends was so entranced by Levin and his beliefs that it was through labouring in the fields alongside his serfs at harvest that he reached enlightenment, that she took a summer job working on a farm in Ayrshire.  When I asked her if it had been the spiritual experience she had been hoping for she shook her head ‘No, just knackering.’

Filled with admiration for Tolstoy’s novels, I embarked on the biography.  I think that was my first experience of understanding that the book is only a small sliver of the writer, and that just because I liked the writing it didn’t necessarily mean that I would admire the writer.  A man of mad, passionately held views, Tolstoy held opposite and contrary opinions at different stags of his life.  From a wealthy family he spent a dissolute youth, and turned to religion and family in his middle years, and finally in old age rejected wife and family and possessions; convinced at each stage that he, alone, was absolutely right on all counts.

He remains such a contrary and troubling figure that even in Russia now, they are not sure how to commemorate him.  So I will just stick with the novels ad forget the rest.

Gardening

I’m not really a gardener, although I come from a family of them.

I live in a flat that has communal grounds, kept in tidy order through monthly visit of a team of men with tractor mowers and huge hedge trimmers.  But even when I had my own little back garden, my heart was never in it; the pleasure to dull effort ratio was never in the right balance for me to do much more than keep it in order.

Yet gardening and gardens frequently appear in my stories.  I only occasionally wonder why, the rest of the time I just close my eyes and visualise how much fun it was when I was a child to creep into the garden to pick pea-pods off the vine and roll the sweet green peas around in my mouth.

In Growth I used the garden and the proud production of an array of vegetables every year as a metaphor for one of the few things that a daughter could ever fathom about her uncommunicative father.

Materiality, like my novel about Rose Fleming, is set in Russia in the mid 1990′s.  Yuri, a teacher of Russian as a foreign language, swallows his contempt for his lazy, expat pupil, Jim, in return for Jim’s  US dollars that fund the rebuilding of Yuri’s family dacha.  Where before they’d only ever had a basic shed as shelter at the garden, it is Yuri’s ambition to have proper house, with electricity, plumbing and most specifically a proper flush toilet.

In my novel I have explored the idea of what the dacha meant to the generation of Russians who were already past retirement age when perestroika came and impoverished them.

Before 1995 the vast majority of Muscovites lived in flats; only the tiny minority of  the very privileged had a house.  Any houses were in outlying areas and were generally formerly dachas of one kind or another.  When I first arrived in Moscow in January 1995 the only person I knew who lived in a house was the managing partner of the firm for which I worked; and he rented it.

It took me a while to understand the concept of  the dacha to most Muscovites at that time.  It was essentially a garden plot allocated to them in an area outside the city, some a great distance away.  In times of hardship, in a country in which there was virtually no logistical system to supply fresh fruit and vegetables, families would have to rely on what they could grow at their dachas in the short summer season.

As they usually had to travel some distance to their allotments, it was common practice to build a small house or cottage so they could stay overnight at weekends or for longer periods during their August holiday.  Small children were frequently sent out of the city for the whole of the summer and usually stayed with their Grandparents at the dacha.

It was a place of refuge, relaxation as well as the source of fresh food which gave people the chance to control and create something for themselves.  Not only could they till the soil, they could build their own little idiosyncratic house.

Monday morning conversations at the office in summer usually centred around the weekend’s gardening or building activities as sophisticated city dwellers showed each other the dirt engrained into the lines on their hands and pointed with ragged fingernails at the scratches on their forearms.

I recall one of my colleagues telling me that it was her dream to have a house of her own so that when she stepped out of her front door she was stepping onto the earth, not onto some drab landing in a common stairwell.  This was an ambition of many, to reconnect with the earth away from the city.

But it led rather alarmingly to the rapid building of large houses just outside the City boundary on what had previously been small garden plots.  Each new house outdid the last in size and opulence, so that now the term ‘dachaland’ covers areas of unregulated development of huge houses.

Where before the traffic jams on the roads out of the city were on a Friday night and were caused by the exodus of cars with wheel barrows on the roof and tomato plant seedlings nodding on the back shelf, or on a Sunday evening bringing the  happily tired and dirty back to their flats.  Now the jams are all the time and every day.

Only if you’re interested…….

Growth appeared in Tell Tales 3, and Materiality in Mechanics’ Institute Review 2

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 675 other followers

%d bloggers like this: