Know Them By Their Feet

On Friday night I had arranged to meet a friend at the Cork and Bottle, an unreconstructed wine bar from the 1980s in central London.  I know it’s virtually unchanged since about 1984, when I first visited; the walls have a yellow patina from the time when smoking was still permitted inside, the fairy lights around the door function only occasionally and there’s a refrigerated cabinet for the selection of cheeses.

The outside door looks so shabby that only those who know what an idiosyncratic  interior is on offer would dare to venture through; and this is very fortunate as it provides a welcome interesting venue in the sea of nastiness around Leicester Square.

The bar is in a basement, and from the street you have to descend a metal spiral staircase.  On Friday I was sitting at a table directly facing the staircase and watched each new customer arrive, feet first.  After the feet, calves and then rump, just as the spiral turned away from me, to the back of the shoulder and head, before the whole person became visible with the final turn at the bottom of the stairs.

Waiting for my friend I became fascinated by the question of whether it was possible to anticipate the look of a person’s face, by looking at their shoes and how nimbly they negotiated the stairs.

When I’m looking for a person in a crowd, I try to conjure a mental picture of them in my mind’s eye, their face, what I think they’ll be wearing, both to make sure that I don’t miss them, and to conjure them as quickly as possible.  On Friday I discovered the same trick doesn’t work at all when all I have to go on is a view of their feet.  I’ve discovered I need to see at least a whole leg.

I’ve read there are some actors who build a performance of a character from the shoes up; that they could visualise the whole person, the outfit, the gait once they had settled on the footwear.

So what do these shoes tell you about the person wearing them?

Which is the teacher, the lawyer, the painter, the beautician or the cook?

Which is blonde, brunette and red-headed?

Who is wearing make-up?  Who has painted finger nails?

Go on, make something up.

Hidden – A Photo

Given the US centric nature of WordPress, I think it highly unlikely that when they suggested Hidden they had in mind the BBC Series which has just finished, however, if you’ve not seen it, keep an eye out for it.  Although not completely satisfying as a conspiracy thriller, it’s always good to watch something which requires a bit of attention to understand what’s going on.

So instead, here’s a photo of a garden in Kyoto.  In a city crammed with people it is still possible to find a quiet spot away from the mêlée.

Trying a New Perspective

Just as I’ve dealt with the repairs and maintenance inside my flat, something is happening outside.  The scaffolding that had appeared along the side of the building while I was in Scotland has, in the last couple of days, spread around the end and across the bay window of my living room.  The progress is infinitesimally slow as the men seem only to work in 10 minute spells every hour or so.  There was a lot of clunking, banging and the ‘beep beep’ of a construction vehicle in stately movement,  yesterday morning at around 8:30, but it stopped after a few minutes, leading to a long period of silence.

Because I’ve decided not to rehang the Austrian blinds that I used to have in the window (largely because they’d been up for 10 years and look like it, and because I got the strings in a tangle…..), I had to leave the curtain closed so the non-workmen couldn’t look straight in and see me in my dressing gown, drinking coffee on the sofa.

Instead, I opened curtains behind the sofa, which I usually have closed, and saw what a beautiful morning it was.  This is the first time these grasses have grown since they were cut right down a couple of years ago, but I’d not really seen them before, set off against the unexpectedly blue sky, catching golden flashes as they undulated in the breeze.

So now I’d don’t feel at all guilty about doing a bit of Elizabeth Barrett reclining on my chaise-long; in fact it feels like a positively virtuous thing to be doing.

(But gird yourselves for more scaffolding stories, as I’ve the feeling this is going to go on for a while, and I’m going to find something positive in it……really, I am.)

More Pots and Potters

I wrote yesterday about how much I enjoyed the BBC4 programme ‘Ceramics: A Fragile History‘ about the history of British pottery.

One segment that I found particularly intriguing was the contrasting interview snippets with Grayson Perry and Edmund de Waal.  One, very serious and measured, an aesthete in a tidy room, making an arrangement of clean white cylindrical vessels, worrying over the variety of whitenesses and textures, and concluding he needed to redo some of them.  The other, unshaven, wild haired, surrounded by untidy piles of paper, slouching, applying photo transfers to the side of a huge pot, cracking jokes designed to aggravate.  One wouldn’t be caught dead anywhere near a potter’s wheel, the other describing his attachment to the ‘throwing’ of a pot on the wheel in almost spiritual terms.

They each seemed so perfectly matched to the pots they produce; you would be unlikely to confuse the work of one with the person of the other.  And  I began to wonder how true it is that our working environment, our work, our appearance are all reflections or facets of the same thing.  We create according to the things that inspire us, the topics that are important to us, but is it also reflected in how we organise our work space, and our posture at our desks?

Do tidy people produce tidy sentences?  Is mess around us reflective of disorder in our thinking, or is it a sign that we are so focussed on the creative process that we can overlook the washing up?  Could I change the nature of my work by changing my environment, or what I wear when I’m doing it? Is it cause and effect or correlation?  Or a bit of both?

I thought I’d not previously heard of Edmund de Waal, but in checking his name I came across this article in The Guardian which made the link (for me) to his authorship of ‘The Hare with the Amber Eyes’, a book I’ve picked up and put down again in shops several times, but which now intrigues me.

Ceramics, Pots and Potters

Not an entirely random collection

I don’t think I’ve been watching more television that usual lately, but it might seem as if I am as I’ve been inspired to wandering thoughts by another BBC4 series.

This one, ‘Ceramics: A Fragile History‘, gave, over three episodes, an overview of British pottery, from rough pots from early history through the industrialisation of the production in Stoke on Trent to what I’ve learnt is called ‘the studio potter’ today. I’ve learnt about the words used to describe the raw materials, the processes and the end results; both terms I’d never heard before, as well as familiar ones, which suddenly made more sense: ‘bone china’ so named because together with clay and other raw materials it included the ash from burnt animal bones, a recipe that allowed the production of a closer copy of Chinese porcelain, if I understood it correctly.

I love a good bit of ceramic, and I’ve bits and pieces picked up around the world, mostly of the ‘specially for the tourists’ variety, but all of which remind me of an experience when I contemplate the collection of knickknackery which covers the shelves in my apartment.

But when did I first discover this?  It could have been when, as a student, I went for a year to Limoges in France.  There are several porcelain factories in the town, including Haviland, and it was on tours there that I first learnt that if you hold true porcelain up to the light you can see through it.  That year everyone got Limoges china for Christmas.  But now that I’m thinking about it, I vaguely remember buying my mother a little plate with a frilly gold edge when I went on a school field trip in America, when I can’t have been more than 8 years old.

Probably, too, from an even earlier age I was aware that at home we had ordinary china, and the special dinner service, and that when my parents were married in 1951, when certain things were still rationed in Britain, they received half a tea service.  Half a tea service?  It’s a notion inconceivable now, but it’s one of those family stories, incomprehensible to a small child, which I simply accepted as the way things were.  I do remember asking ‘which half’?

Throughout the programme, there was the constant refrain that china and earthenware can be both functional and beautiful.  The final programme traced the story that as the production of ‘ordinary’ crockery became increasingly industrialised so were born the ‘studio potters’, who make things by hand.

What was so interesting was that there seemed to be a philosophical belief system behind all those chunky, knobbly bowls and plates so favoured by brown rice and vegetable curry restaurants, like Cranks, and the faux French country kitchen styling sold by Habitat in the 1970s.  I always disliked them.  I didn’t believe that anything with such a rough surface texture could ever be properly clean.  I particularly dislike drinking tea or coffee out of them.

Bernard Leach was the man with the philosophy, and he produced chunky hand thrown useful things in his pottery in St Ives which caught the ‘home made’ mood of the 1960s through to the 70s.  He evidently believed that his was the only true way as described by Lucy Rie one of his collaborators whose natural preference was to produce finer, thinner, more elegant pieces.  I’d never heard of her before, but it was worth watching the programme to see her nearly fall into her kiln and have to be rescued by David Attenborough.

There is more to say, but I’m going to save it for another day…..

Nursing The Computer Through a Hissy Fit

Yesterday wasn’t a good day for the PC; in fact the last week has been a series of days which weren’t that good for the laptop.  I’ve spent several hours watching that screen with the little blue bar scrolling backwards and forwards on the screen saying ‘Please wait.  Trying to repair.’

Reluctant to sit and watch helplessly, I was even less keen on walking away and leaving it.  What might it do if I wasn’t watching?  We’ve been through this awful little pantomime together twice in the last 5 days.

It’s just another addition to the list which includes constant deployment of the fan, frequent slippage of the wifi button (which is I think in a poorly designed, far too accessible spot) and an intermittent  reluctance to open iTunes, factors which indicate it’s time I start researching for a replacement.

The prospect of this fill me with deep, deep reluctance for two reasons, the first is that I’m very fond of my shiny red laptop, the second is that making a rational replacement choice, based on sensible, comprehensible advice is virtually impossible.

My base knowledge is limited.  Reading reviews on the internet opens one up to having to decide how much of a lunatic each contributor is; asking friends usually reveals that their knowledge is as limited as mine, and usually based on the style and colour of the outside; and trying to ask an IT professional merely unleashes a flood of incomprehensible jargon.

Widening the question to whether I should switch from a PC to a Mac raises even more imponderables; it’s like asking a football supporter about switching team allegiance.  People who used to have a PC but now have a Mac tend to explain their preference based on some extra function the one has over the other, and then when I investigate it seems that both systems now do it.

It reminds me of visiting a friend of my mother’s who had emigrated from Manchester to Los Angeles in the late 1940s, and from the things she said it was clear she assumed that even when we visited her in 1969 that nothing had changed in the UK; that we would never have been in a car, nor experienced central heating.

In the spirit of experimentation, yesterday I visited an Apple shop; my first ever such visit.  The most astonishing thing about the experience, apart from my not being able to get the demonstration model to work on my own, was how articulate the sales guy was: I think it might count as the first time an IT person has spoken to me in complete sentences entirely devoid of jargon.

And the laptops are all so sleek and shiny…..

Understanding Song Lyrics ……. Or Not

I’ve heard a couple of instances recently of pop song lyrics being compared to poetry.  Firstly, it seems that some of Jarvis Cocker’s lyrics are being published by Faber & Faber.  While I heard him on the radio denying that he would compare his compositions to poetry, publication by such a prominent poetry publisher, suggests something to the contrary.

I am utterly unqualified to comment on either Jarvis Cocker or poetry, but there was a striking synchronicity in that news on the one hand, and a segment in the recent Stephen Fry programme about language ‘Fry’s Planet World‘.  The series in itself was an interesting one, looking at the development of language and the way it is used, and in the final episode, among other people, he spoke to Richard Curtis who commented on how powerful he found many popular song lyrics; they say things simply and effectively.  Part of his argument about their strength was the idea that we share the experience of them and the accompanying music with thousands of other people and that increases their power.

That assertion is somewhat mysterious to me.   I’m not sure I could even tell you what the words in most of my favourite songs actually are.  I hear some of the words, or more specifically I hear some of the vowel sounds and make assumptions about what the words are; I rarely hear a coherent idea, or more than three words in a row.

As a teenager in the age of the LP, part of the whole experience was to play the vinyl on my record player and lie on my bed with the album cover propped on my stomach reading the lyrics off the back of the sleeve.  I think that probably means that the last time I paid any particular attention to song lyrics was before I left university.  Given the number of tracks I now have on my iPod, that’s an awful lot of words that have totally passed me by.

Interestingly, though, I do notice if the lyrics are simple-minded and repetitive, and switch those songs off.  Otherwise, I think it is the combination of the music, the shapes of the sounds and the timbre of the performer’s voice that appeal to me; I’d listen to Michael Stipe sing pretty much anything, but couldn’t be persuaded to sit through a single minute of Celine Dion do the least thing.

Richard Curtis’s comments about the shared experience of listening to pop songs reminded me of possibly one of the most ludicrous experiences of my working life.  I was invited to partake of corporate hospitality at a U2 concert at Earls Court in London by a firm of accounting advisors.  I accepted because, when I can close my eyes and ears to their self obsessed pretentiousness, I’m a fan.  It was somewhat disconcerting to be in  group of accountants dressed in their office wear, standing, waving their arms in the air, bellowing along to the chorus of ‘Sunday Bloody Sunday’.  I felt utterly displaced, as if I was having an experience which would be categorised as the polar opposite of a ‘shared’ one.

But here’s one song in which I can hear all the words, and which appeals to me, probably because of the fantastically economical way it tells a whole life story.  I also like the, possibly apocryphal, story that Mary Chapin Carpenter was inspired to write it after seeing a tremendously patronising advertisement for Geritol, a US multi vitamin, which was, at the time, directed at women.

Ancient Technology

I love a good science programme on the television, so I do find myself watching BBC4 programmes on the iPlayer quite frequently.  Generally, I watch, captivated by knowing that if I concentrate really hard I will, for a brief moment, understand what they’re talking about.

Even when I don’t remember any of the science, the things that stick are the stories of the scientists, the rivalries, the false leads, the personalities, the discovery races.  I enjoy the tales of constant questing and questioning; the way the contemporary commentators frame prevailing theories, implicitly accepting that when the next new theory comes along, what we think we know now may be proved to be wrong.

The recent programme ‘Shock and Awe: The Story of Electricity‘ however, had me paying extra attention and delving into my memory banks: I remember ‘doing’ this at school!  Finally a whole segment during which I actually knew what was going to be said next about the developments that led up to the invention of the transistor.  We did a lot about electricity and the transistor for ‘Higher’ Physics; we were even taught a little bit about printed circuit boards, but that was all a bit cutting edge then for the school curriculum (or maybe that’s when I stopped listening).

I enjoyed physics at school, perhaps because everything I heard in the classroom was something new to me.  I was always amazed that some of the boys already knew things the teacher was saying: when we did those multitude of experiments with ticker tape and a ‘friction compensated slope’, they already knew that the frequency of electricity was 50 Hz.  I can remember asking one of them how on earth they knew that already…..of course, I’ve never forgotten.

Equally when we did that experiment with the Maltese cross and the cathode ray tube, they all nodded, ‘yeah, yeah, Television’, while I was fascinated and surprised.  So I was particularly struck when Prof Jim Al-Khalili, having demonstrated the cathode ray tube, commented that ‘of course’ that’s how televisions were made for decades.  And I wondered, could there be people watching this programme who’ve only ever seen a flat screen TV?  It’s even less likely they’ve listened to a transistor radio……

The only thing that’s constant is change.

Last week, I also watched the programme ‘Faster than the Speed of Light‘, presented by Prof Marcus du Sautoy, which examined new findings by a team of Italian scientists which suggested that they had discovered a particle that could travel faster than the speed of light.  If true, apparently this would undermine much of what is believed about everything, as many theories in physics are predicated on the basis that the speed of light is an absolute maximum.

That’s the most that I understood about the science; what I loved about the programme were the interviews with other scientists who now have the opportunity and obligation to test their own fondly held theories, their live’s work, against this new data.  They all have to find ways to knock holes in it; it gave a fantastic insight into the rough and tumble of the scientific world, a powerful brew of science, ego and curiosity.

Writing this post I looked up both of the Prof presenters, to make sure I was spelling their names correctly, and noticed that they both hold academic positions with slightly odd, potentially Orwellian, names.  Prof Jim holds the chair of Public Engagement in Science at the University of Surrey, and Prof Marcus is the Simonyi Professor for the Public Understanding of Science.

Hmm.  ‘Engagement’ versus ‘Understanding’?  Pedagogue or Pied Piper? I’m sensing a touch of inter institutional rivalry there.  Are they merely post facto smoke screens to recognise that the guys are always on the telly so they’d better be called something to explain why they’re never around the university?  Or did the job description ‘get yourself on the telly’, come first?

Opportunity – A Photo

Since embarking on this blog I’ve started taking photos as pretty much every opportunity.  It doesn’t even necessarily need to be a good photo I’ve discovered – I can always play around with the basic Photoshop functions to improve it, or crop it to see something from a new angle.

When I look back through my files of photos, I appreciate how very fortunate I’ve been to have the opportunity to visit unusual places; but now I also realise that every sight represents an opportunity.

This shot was taken in July this year at a busy road intersection in the City of London, by the Old Bailey; I like the fact that it doesn’t look like it.

Down With a (Big) Bump

It's never a good sign when you have to take a photo in this cupboard

The better the time I’ve had away, the worse  the coming back home ‘decompression’, it seems.

I drove back to London on Thursday, stopping off in the middle for a chat and a coffee with a friend (and a little detour as I go a bit lost en-rout to the rendez-vous).  It’s a drive of about 440 miles, and usually takes me about 8 hours, all in.  It’s a journey I’ve done many times, and there are sections, going across Bow Moor in Cumbria, or passing Beattock Summit where I actually enjoy it.

This time, the drive was fine, until the last 3 miles, which took me nearly an hour.  I should have known.  It’s never a good idea to use the North Circular if there’s an alternative route, and once on it I was totally trapped, and inched my way through the gridlock to home.  I was starting to lose interest in paying attention to the road, feeling totally punch drunk by the time I arrived.

I don’t really know what made me look in the central heating cupboard, but once done, there was no forgetting the water dripping through the ceiling from the upstairs flat.  Shutting the door didn’t elimintate the need to do something.

Hoping, no matter how fervently, that it would have fixed itself when I wasn’t looking, didn’t work as a strategy, so with my bags still piled in the hall, I mopped up, balanced bowls in the awkward corners under the drips and congratulated myself on not resorting to weeping.

Looking on the bright side, it wasn’t anywhere near as bad as the last leak in that cupboard which had led to the complete replacement of the wooden floor throughout the flat.  Everything’s relative.

And without the water ingress, I’d not have been part of the comedy skit with my neighbour on Friday morning.  The flat upstairs is rarely occupied, but thankfully the owner’s brother responded very quickly to the leak alert (probably, like me, because he lives in fear of a repeat of the disaster of the last flood).  I expect he regretted coming straight from work in his smart dark suit, and shiny, sharp, shoes.

Trying to find the source of a water leak is a very efficient bonding activity for strangers; you share war stories and allow your neighbours into your flat and into the deepest recesses of your cupboards; you compare totally uninformed untrained opinion on the reasons for the problem, and you complain about the builders.

It’s lucky that I had a torch.

The repair is still a work in progress; I’m hopeful and tolerating the banging noises from upstairs as I write, and have reduced the visits into my cupboard to check the ceiling and dripping into the cereal bowls to hourly.

Hopefully, tonight, I won’t dream about a flood again.